<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT4) Is the E-600 real?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Utopium</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2902</link>
		<dc:creator>Utopium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2902</guid>
		<description>Well shit, I thought this was a photoshop job but it turns out to be real:

http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1251694801.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well shit, I thought this was a photoshop job but it turns out to be real:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1251694801.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1251694801.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visual Effects</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2837</link>
		<dc:creator>Visual Effects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2837</guid>
		<description>The photos my be real but it is not a new product.  I suggest you check out this post at DP.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1022&amp;thread=32812267</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photos my be real but it is not a new product.  I suggest you check out this post at DP.</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1022&amp;thread=32812267" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1022&amp;thread=32812267</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TS</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2827</link>
		<dc:creator>TS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2827</guid>
		<description>Look at the bottom of the camera. It has no Olympus sticker (with model #, serial # &quot;CE&quot; logo etc.) It looks fake to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the bottom of the camera. It has no Olympus sticker (with model #, serial # &#8220;CE&#8221; logo etc.) It looks fake to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jj</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>I would that the number photoshoped is the &quot;0&quot;, I compared to some e-620 pics and they are virtually identical, buttons, ize, labels etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would that the number photoshoped is the &#8220;0&#8243;, I compared to some e-620 pics and they are virtually identical, buttons, ize, labels etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2802</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2802</guid>
		<description>No video on the dial, so even if it was real no real interest in it. I&#039;ll stick to my e-520.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No video on the dial, so even if it was real no real interest in it. I&#8217;ll stick to my e-520.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinnombre</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>sinnombre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>Look closely on the pictures here

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1022&amp;message=32799334&amp;changemode=1

The Six is obviously a photoshoped Five</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look closely on the pictures here</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1022&amp;message=32799334&amp;changemode=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1022&amp;message=32799334&amp;changemode=1</a></p>
<p>The Six is obviously a photoshoped Five</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achiinto</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Achiinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>It is kind of weird to release a number lower than the current E-620. I would imagine a E5xx with 5xx &gt; 520 or a E6xx with 6xx &gt; 620.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is kind of weird to release a number lower than the current E-620. I would imagine a E5xx with 5xx &gt; 520 or a E6xx with 6xx &gt; 620.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dima</title>
		<link>http://43rumors.com/ft5-the-e-600-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4676#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s look like a fake
reasons :

1) we see e-600 in A SHOP !!! not in presentation . not in a press release - but in a SHOP ? and this is clearly a shop on those picutre

2) on a first picture - there is clearly seems e-620 on background - and those 2 look exactly a same .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s look like a fake<br />
reasons :</p>
<p>1) we see e-600 in A SHOP !!! not in presentation . not in a press release &#8211; but in a SHOP ? and this is clearly a shop on those picutre</p>
<p>2) on a first picture &#8211; there is clearly seems e-620 on background &#8211; and those 2 look exactly a same .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
