Leica vs MicroFourThirds poll!

September 9, 2009
Rumors
11 Comments

With the release of the X1 compact camera Leica has chosen to go its own way by not joining the Olympus-Panasonic MicroFourThirds partnership. Let us know what you think about that!

Select your favorite future Micro Four Thirds lenses (choose a maximum of 10 lenses!)

25mm f/1.2 (4%, 973 Votes)
12mm f/2.0 (Compact) (3%, 772 Votes)
12-50mm, f/2.0 (Video optimized, OIS) (3%, 691 Votes)
12-60mm f/2.8-4.0 (like the Four Thirds Zuiko) (3%, 663 Votes)
12mm f/1.4 (3%, 605 Votes)
14mm f/1.4 (2%, 517 Votes)
17mm f/1.4 (2%, 509 Votes)
50mm f/1.4 (with OIS and Macro) (2%, 503 Votes)
12-75mm f/2.8 (Video optimized, OIS, for $1.000-$1.500) (2%, 500 Votes)
50mm f/1.8 (Pancake) (2%, 477 Votes)
50mm f/2.0 (Macro) (2%, 445 Votes)
50-200mm f/2.8 (Video optimized, OIS) (2%, 439 Votes)
14-50mm f/2.0 (Weather sealed pro lens optimized for video with OIS) (2%, 430 Votes)
12-75mm f/2.8-4.5 (Compact version) (2%, 416 Votes)
50mm f/1.2 (2%, 416 Votes)
40mm f/2.0 (Pancake, Cheap) (2%, 388 Votes)
100-300mm f/2.8 (Video optimized, OIS) (2%, 384 Votes)
high quality 1.4x tele-converter (2%, 371 Votes)
20mm f/1.2 (2%, 368 Votes)
7-12mm f/2.5 (2%, 367 Votes)
high quality 2x tele-converter (2%, 358 Votes)
90mm f/2.5 (Macro) (2%, 357 Votes)
7mm f/3.5 (Compact, 400$) (1%, 328 Votes)
12-45mm f/2.8 (OIS) (1%, 327 Votes)
300mm f/2.8 (600$) (1%, 321 Votes)
10mm f/2.0 (1%, 319 Votes)
17mm f/2.0 (Pancake) (1%, 312 Votes)
35mm f/1.2 (1%, 308 Votes)
11-44mm f/2.0 (OIS) (1%, 293 Votes)
9mm f/4.0 (Super wide-non fisheye, compact, $400) (1%, 291 Votes)
35-100mm f/2 (Video optimized, OIS) (1%, 279 Votes)
7mm f/2.0 (1%, 274 Votes)
35-100mm f/2.8 (Compact) (1%, 273 Votes)
12-60mm f/4.0 (Compact) (1%, 259 Votes)
14-100mm f/2.8-4.0 (OIS) (1%, 250 Votes)
45mm f/1.2 (1%, 250 Votes)
10-20mm f/2.8 (Video optimized, OIS) (1%, 246 Votes)
40mm f/1.2 (1%, 240 Votes)
150mm f/2.0 (1%, 233 Votes)
100mm f/2.0 (1%, 226 Votes)
12-35mm f/2.8-3.5 (Compact) (1%, 225 Votes)
70mm f/1.4 (OIS) (1%, 221 Votes)
30mm f/1.7 (Pancake) (1%, 211 Votes)
42mm f/1.4 (1%, 210 Votes)
200-600mm (pro lens for sport and wildlife $3.500-$4.500) (1%, 206 Votes)
35mm f/2.0 (Macro) (1%, 205 Votes)
85mm f/2.8 (Pancake) (1%, 204 Votes)
10mm f/4.0 (Tilt/shift) (1%, 203 Votes)
14-45mm f/2.8 ($500) (1%, 200 Votes)
14-35mm f/2 (Video optimized, OIS) (1%, 197 Votes)
30mm f/0.95 (with AF, 1400$) (1%, 196 Votes)
10mm f/4.0 (Compact) (1%, 188 Votes)
45mm f/1.8 (1%, 186 Votes)
12mm f/4.0 (Tilt/shift) (1%, 184 Votes)
14-85mm f/2.8-3.5 (1%, 183 Votes)
85mm f/1.8 (1%, 183 Votes)
100mm f/2.8 (Compact) (1%, 180 Votes)
25mm f/2.0 (leaf shutter to give flash synchronisation to 1/500 or 1/1000 sec) (1%, 178 Votes)
42mm f/1.2 (1%, 168 Votes)
14-75mm (Compact all-around lens) (1%, 162 Votes)
15mm f/1.4 (1%, 160 Votes)
10-20mm f/4 (Compact and cheap) (1%, 159 Votes)
5.5mm (Super Fisheye) (1%, 155 Votes)
70-300mm (with tripod mount) (1%, 149 Votes)
11-22/2.8-3.5 (Compact) (1%, 144 Votes)
9mm f/2.8 (1%, 142 Votes)
400mm f/5.6 (under $1.500) (1%, 139 Votes)
45-100mm f/2.8 (Video optimized, OIS) (1%, 136 Votes)
200mm f/2.8 (1%, 133 Votes)
180mm f/2.8 (Compact) (1%, 131 Votes)
135mm f/2.8 (Compact) (1%, 115 Votes)
18-60mm f/2.5 (Video optimized, OIS) (0%, 113 Votes)
14-35mm f/2.8-3.5 (Compact) (0%, 112 Votes)
58mm f/1.2 (0%, 103 Votes)
1000mm f/5.6 (mirror lens) (0%, 101 Votes)
10-30mm f/2.8 (0%, 100 Votes)
100-400mm f/5.6 ($1.500-$2.000) (0%, 97 Votes)
10-25mm f/2.8 (0%, 90 Votes)
14mm f/2.8 (Zuiko version of the Panasonic lens) (0%, 86 Votes)
15-200mm f/4.5-6.0 (collapsible MSC) (0%, 81 Votes)
20mm f/2.8 (pancake) (0%, 77 Votes)
35-75mm f/2 (Video optimized, OIS) (0%, 73 Votes)
20-60mm f/2.8 (Video optimized, OIS) (0%, 72 Votes)
55mm f/1.4 (0%, 68 Votes)
67mm f/1.8 (0%, 67 Votes)
150mm f/3.5 (0%, 36 Votes)

Total Voters: 4,322

Loading ...